Reconstruction, interpretation, historicity. Again on the relationship between psychoanalysis and history
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6093/2284-0184/5023Keywords:
Philosophy, History, Psychoanalysis, Giuseppe CacciatoreAbstract
When we think about what might be the common areas of historical research and of psychological and psychoanalytic research, we usually think about the categories of construction and interpretation, but also about those of narration and temporality. If you think at the narrative act inherent in every writing of history and at its hermeneutical implications (but also practical and existential, at the level of individuals and of community), we will see exactly how many points of contact may be created between history and psychoanalysis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
- Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
- Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).