Imagining living spaces in extreme conditions: suggestions from a case study in Bari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6870Keywords:
Spatial cognition, COVID emergency, Lockdown, Urban spacesAbstract
The coronavirus pandemic has affected over 200 countries worldwide, finding an environment well-suited to its spread in cities as the heart of our civilization, as the meeting place for ideas, cultures and commercial exchanges. In these circumstances, prevention and control play a vital role, revealing the need to improve the current knowledge of users’ perception of urban spaces and the way in which spaces are perceived and used. This work aims at investigating how the coronavirus emergency influenced perception of the surrounding spaces. In this regard, two questionnaire-based surveys were carried out on a sample of students from the School of Engineering of the Polytechnic University of Bari (Italy), one during the lockdown phase and one immediately after. Even after only a preliminary analysis, results showed some interesting patterns. They revealed, on the one hand, the expectations regarding possible changes, indicating places that are particularly important or symbolic for participants, and which are perceived to be missing, and on the other, the feelings of fear, worry and uncertainty with regard to the risk of contagion during post-lockdown access to and navigation through them. Nonetheless, some changes were considered positive, thus providing a strong indication of the expectations placed on future cities
Downloads
References
Borgo, S., Calafiore, A., Boella, G., Guarino, N. (2017). Urban artefacts and their social roles: towards an ontology of social practices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, L’Aquila, Septenber 4-6.
Cutini, Valerio. (2001). Centrality and land use: Three case studies on the configurational hypothesis. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography (188).
De Certeu, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley: California University Press.
Forester, J. (1984). Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 23-31.
Foucault, M. (1977), Microfisica del potere. Interventi politici, a cura di Alessandro Fontana, Pasquale Pasquino, Torino, Einaudi.
Frank, A. U, Bittner, S., & Raubal, M.(2001). Spatial and cognitive simulation with multi-agent systems. Spatial Information Theory, pp. 124-139, Springer.
Freksa, C. (1991). Qualitative spatial reasoning. In D. M. Mark & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, pp. 361-372, Dordercht: Kluwer.
Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in Evolution. Edinburgh: Williams.
Hillier, B. (2015). Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. London: Space Syntax.
Hillier, B., & Penn, A. (2004). Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), 501-511.
Jude Scott, J.G.W., Wellheiser, J.G., Scott, J., Barton, J.P. (2002). An Ounce of Prevention: Integrated Disaster Planning for Archives, Libraries, and Record Centres. New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.
Kuliga, S. F., Nelligan, B., Dalton – Conroy, R.., Marchette, S., Shelton, A. L., Carlson, L., & Hölscher, C..(2019). Exploring Individual Differences and Building Complexity in Wayfinding: The Case of the Seattle Central Library. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 622-665.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Magnaghi, A. (2005). The Urban Village: A Charter for Democracy and Local Self-sustainable Development. London: Zed Books.
Mastrodonato, G., Camarda, D., Patano, M. (2019). The collective construction and management of spatial knowledge in open spaces: A pilot study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11792, 236-243.
Montello, D. R., Waller, D., Hegarty, M., & Richardson, A.E. (2004). Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In G. A. Allen (Ed.), Human Spatial Memory: Remembering where, pp. 251-285, London: Erlbaum.
Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2012). Cities as Sustainable Ecosystems: Principles and Practices. Washington: Island Press.
Peponis, J., Dalton -Conroy, R., Wineman, J., & Dalton, N. (2004). Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors’ spatial behaviors in open plan exhibition settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(3), 453-473
Ratti, C. (2004). Urban texture and space syntax: some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), 487-499.
Rodwin, L. (1981). Cities and City Planning. New York: Plenum.
Stiny, G., & Mitchell, W. J. (1978). The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B, 5(1), 5-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
