Il quesito nel referendum costituzionale: leggi di riforma organica o a contenuto plurimo?

Abstract

The exercise of freedom to vote and the possibility of its compression in the heterogeneity reason of the referendum question under the scrutiny of the electoral body, although counted among the problems has always been the object of particular attention on the part of the doctrine, he has returned to assume particular centrality within the gius-publicist reflection as a result of the referendum held last December, as part of the audit procedure constitutional time to rewrite more parts of particular fondamentale. In text, already in reason for the title, this question has strongly reignited debate about the impact, negatively, may be exercised to the detriment of the referendum will be a reform by uneven content, quid est in multiple content. In view of the possible devaluation of the electorate's will, the search for remedies useful in the system is bound to be fruitless. Already removed from the availability of the electorate as it is worded, the referendum question in the present case, does not seem to be taken to the object of eligibility review by the Constitutional Court, nor seems to be forced to comply with a certain structure, by means of any ordinary law. Rather, a kind of corrective system can be traced in the attitude of the electorate, whose votes, opposed to reform projects of this type, it can result in an effective evaluation tool not only content, but the very structure of the question in which it is expressed reformist intent.