For a Logic of Cultural Sciences: Croce and Cassirer

Authors

  • Fabrizio Lomonaco Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/2144

Keywords:

Croce, Cassirer, Philosophy of Culture, Enlightement

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the comparaison between the theories of Ernst Cassirer and Benedetto Croce about The Logik of Humanities and others Cassirer’s Essais on the «Philosophy of Culture». The first part presents the concrete passages of mutual criticism on language and its relations with art and in relation to the interpretation of the modern history of philosophy between Humanism and Enlightenment. Brief final remarks recapitulate their radically different ways of understanding idealism with respect to the spiritual activity of man in the history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-05

How to Cite

Lomonaco, F. (2013). For a Logic of Cultural Sciences: Croce and Cassirer. Bollettino Filosofico, 28, 198–217. https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/2144

Issue

Vol. 28 (2013): Croce in Between Past and Future

Section

Editorial

License

The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the  sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.