Phenomenology and pragmatist conceptions of cognitive science

Authors

  • Manuel De Pinedo Universidad de Granada
  • Manuel Heras Escribano Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/2838

Keywords:

Phenomenology, Pragmatism, Cognitive science, A-Life, Empathy

Abstract

In this paper I argue that there is a parallelism between, on the one hand, the reactions of some phenomenologists to the philosophy of Husserl (in particular, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty and Ortega y Gasset) and, on the other, some recent pragmatist conceptions within the philosophy of logic and the philosophy of the cognitive sciences. Against syntactical, and ultimately Cartesian, understandings of cognition, both fields highlight the intrinsically pragmatic, embedded and embodied character of mind and language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-04

How to Cite

De Pinedo, M., & Heras Escribano, M. (2014). Phenomenology and pragmatist conceptions of cognitive science. Bollettino Filosofico, 29, 91–118. https://doi.org/10.6093/1593-7178/2838

Issue

Vol. 29 (2014): Analytics and Continentals

Section

Focus

License

The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the  sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.